You're offline

Some features may be unavailable. Changes will sync when you reconnect.

security
Rakshex

Rakshex vs Snyk

Snyk is excellent for static code vulnerability scanning. Rakshex operates at the other end of the spectrum — scanning live API traffic at runtime, detecting LLM-specific threats like prompt injection, and providing cost intelligence Snyk simply does not cover.

FEATURESNYKRAKSHEX
Analysis ApproachStatic code analysis (SAST) — scans source filesRuntime API traffic analysis — scans live requests
OWASP API Top 10Partial — code patterns only, no runtime contextFull OWASP API Top 10 on live traffic
Prompt Injection DetectionNot available — LLM threats not in scope50+ payload patterns, real-time blocking
LLM Cost IntelligenceNot availablePer-model, per-agent cost attribution + forecasting
Shadow API DetectionNot availableRuntime undocumented endpoint discovery
Kill SwitchNot availableHard stop on budget, anomaly, or red-team score
PCI DSS v4.0.1 ComplianceCode-level vulnerability mapping onlyFull PCI DSS v4.0.1 runtime compliance reports
Agent-level Threat DetectionNot availableMCP tool governance, agent drift detection
API Collection ScanningScans code, not Postman/OpenAPI collectionsDirect Postman, OpenAPI, Bruno import + scan
Runtime PII RedactionNot availableReal-time redaction in live API traffic

When to choose Snyk

  • • You need static code scanning in CI/CD pipelines
  • • Your primary threat model is dependency vulnerabilities
  • • You do not have LLM agents in production
  • • Runtime API security is handled by another tool

When to choose Rakshex

  • • You need runtime API traffic scanning (not just SAST)
  • • You have LLM agents exposed to user input
  • • You need prompt injection and shadow API detection
  • • You want LLM cost attribution alongside security
  • • You need PCI DSS compliance from runtime evidence
TRY RAKSHEX FREE →